‘Unboxing’ an often misunderstood ministry of the Church
The focus or theme of this particular issue is, most definitely, not one that the One Voice has ever highlighted, at least not during my tenure. Luckily, Father Bryan Jerabek, the diocesan Judicial Vicar or “chief judge of the diocese,” reached out with the suggestion that we do just that. In truth, I am somewhat ashamed that the One Voice has not capitalized on the opportunity to provide its readers with an in-depth look into the work of the diocesan Marriage Tribunal, but, as with most things, what can seem unpleasant is often avoided.
The focus or theme of this particular issue is, most definitely, not one that the One Voice has ever highlighted, at least not during my tenure. Luckily, Father Bryan Jerabek, the diocesan Judicial Vicar or “chief judge of the diocese,” reached out with the suggestion that we do just that. In truth, I am somewhat ashamed that the One Voice has not capitalized on the opportunity to provide its readers with an in-depth look into the work of the diocesan Marriage Tribunal, but, as with most things, what can seem unpleasant is often avoided.
For those who are wondering, the tribunal is a Church court “established to render judgement in judicial matters pertaining to ecclesiastical [or Church] law.” The Tribunal’s mission is to “provide justice for all persons who approach the Church’s court system, rendering judgements concerning people’s rights and obligations as well as their status in the Church.”
But what does that really mean to our readers? Simply, the Marriage Tribunal deals with annulments. More than likely, everyone has heard the word, especially in the context of civil law. However, for Catholics, the word can have many negative connotations attached. To help “unbox” annulments, this issue features the insight of Bishop Raica, who himself holds a Doctorate in Canon Law. The following pages also supply frequently asked questions posed by the faithful regarding annulments and commonly-used terms of the Tribunal. The cover story features Sarah Labriola, a convert who experienced the healing grace of the annulment process, and one of this issue’s features highlights the role of John Martin, a lay advocate, or a person who assists someone seeking an annulment. Wrapping up the coverage is Father Jerabek offering his pastoral understanding of the work undertaken by the diocesan Tribunal, which he oversees.
Ultimately, it is my hope that this issue will provide some helpful and informative insight into the Church’s annulment process as one seeking out truth and healing.